Infatica review (2026): careful vetting, unremarkable results

Infatica pricing (as of October 2026)

Pay-as-you-go

$4.00/GB²

Monthly plans

25 GB $96 ($3.84); 100 GB $360 ($3.60); 241 GB $700 ($2.90); 500 GB $1,350 ($2.70); 1,000 GB $2,600 ($2.60)²

Annual plans

20% cheaper, e.g. 12,000 GB for $24,960 ($2.08)²

Trial

$4 for 7 days²

Minimum

Not confirmed

Pay-as-you-go costs $4.00 per GB. Monthly plans run from 25 GB for $96 ($3.84/GB) through 100 GB for $360 ($3.60), 241 GB for $700 ($2.90) and 500 GB for $1,350 ($2.70) to 1,000 GB for $2,600 ($2.60). Annual plans are 20% cheaper, reaching $2.08/GB on a 12,000 GB plan².

Those are mid-market prices. At 100 GB, Infatica’s $360 compares with $225 at Webshare, $200 pay-as-you-go at Rayobyte and $49 on Evomi’s plan^3,4,5. At 1 TB, $2,600 is almost four times Rayobyte’s pay-as-you-go price⁴.

The $4, seven-day trial is the better feature²: cheap enough to run your own targets before committing, which, given the test results below, you should.

Targeting, protocols and sessions

Targeting

Country, city, ISP and ZIP²

Protocols

HTTP(S) and SOCKS5²

Sticky sessions

Preset durations from 5 to 60 minutes¹

Targeting covers country, city, ISP and ZIP, over HTTP(S) or SOCKS5². Sticky sessions use preset durations from 5 to 60 minutes¹ — shorter than most mid-market rivals: Decodo and Oxylabs allow 24 hours^6,7. For long logged-in flows, that ceiling is a real limit.

Sourcing, KYC and trust

KYC

Mandatory: ID and selfie via Veriff before the first purchase¹

Pool

Claims 45M+ in 195+ countries (other pages say 40M+); Proxyway measured 2,130,875 unique IPs^2,1

Support

24/7 chat¹

The KYC is the headline: ID and selfie before the first purchase, and for some products verification is needed just to see the plans¹. Support is available by chat 24/7¹.

The pool is less convincing. Infatica’s pages variously claim 40 million and 45 million-plus IPs in 195-plus countries²; Proxyway counted 2,130,875 unique IPs and noted the pool skews towards Russia, Brazil and China¹. If your targets are mostly in the US or Western Europe, test coverage there during the trial.

Independent performance evidence

The average response of 1.64 s was the second-slowest of the seven providers here in the April 2026 round, and the 95th-percentile response of 7.80 s means one request in twenty took nearly eight seconds; IPRoyal’s, by comparison, was 4.13 s^1,8. Success, at 97.57%, was below Decodo, Oxylabs, SOAX, Webshare and Rayobyte, and above only IPRoyal^9,7,10,11,12. Proxyway notes that the network scales well.

Third-party figures are snapshots from the stated date, on the tester’s targets and setup; see our methodology for how we use each source.

Pros and cons

Who should pick Infatica — and who shouldn’t

Pick it if

• You want a supplier that verifies every customer, and you don’t qualify for Bright Data.
• Your targets are in countries where its pool is strong.
• You value round-the-clock chat support.

Skip it if

• Consistent response times matter — a 7.80 s P95 is a long tail.
• You need long sessions; Decodo offers 24 hours and tested faster.
• Price matters; Rayobyte also vets customers and is cheaper at most volumes.

Alternatives to Infatica

• Bright Data review — even stricter KYC plus carrier targeting, at a higher price.
• Rayobyte review — also verifies customers (SumSub), with cheaper pay-as-you-go.
• Decodo review — faster and more consistent in the same April 2026 round.

For the full picture, see the best residential proxies by use case, the price-per-GB tables and our index of all eleven reviews.